Jeremy Renner’s Forgotten Doc Holliday Movie Will Never Beat Tombstone

Doc Holliday is a famous character in Westerns, played by many actors in movies and on television over the years – including Kirk Douglas, Stacy Keach, and Dennis Quaid. Each actor has attempted to capture the complex personality of a man who was both a refined Southern gentleman and a dangerous killer. However, Val Kilmer’s performance in Tombstone is widely considered the best, presenting Holliday as a uniquely charismatic and graceful figure.

It’s hard to capture the essence of such a famous figure, which could explain why a planned movie starring Jeremy Renner, announced back in 2017, never came to fruition. The film was intended to tell the story of Doc Holliday, based on Mary Doria Russell’s novels, following his life from a dentist in Georgia to the iconic gunslinger known for the shootout at the O.K. Corral. Despite initial enthusiasm and plans to bring Holliday to a new generation, the project has been put on hold indefinitely – and perhaps that’s for the best.

The Untitled Doc Holliday Project Has Since Been Forgotten

In 2017, PalmStar Media revealed plans for a biopic starring Jeremy Renner. The film would be based on Mary Doria Russell’s popular novels, Doc and Epitaph, which tell the story of Doc Holliday’s life, from his beginnings as a dentist in the South to his days as a gunslinger. Renner’s production company, The Combine, along with Don Handfield and Kevin Frakes, was also involved in producing the movie.

Although the project started with a lot of promise, it’s currently not moving forward and hasn’t seen any recent progress. The original story, though, provides a fascinating look at Doc Holliday’s life. In the book, Russell examines Holliday’s youth, showing him as a refined individual struggling with tuberculosis while navigating the wild west town of Dodge City. The story focuses on his relationships, especially with his partner, Mária Katarina Harony, and his developing…

Epitaph tells the story behind the famous gunfight at the O.K. Corral, exploring everything that happened before and after the thirty-second shootout. Russell details the political and social atmosphere of the time, showing how long-standing conflicts and personal grudges led to the violence. The book also focuses on Josephine Sarah Marcus, Wyatt Earp’s life partner, and how she influenced his lasting reputation.

Mary Doria Russell’s Doc Holliday Books Would be Difficult to Adapt

Mary Doria Russell’s novels are highly praised for how they depict the American West and its famous characters. Her novel Doc was named one of the best books of 2011 by publications like The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, with reviewers highlighting its realistic and sympathetic portrayal of Doc Holliday. Her book Epitaph also received critical acclaim for its detailed look at a key historical event, and was similarly recognized by The Washington Post as one of the best novels of 2015.

These aren’t typical biographies. They’re stories about historical figures, written in a style similar to new journalism. While some details, like conversations, have been added to make the story more engaging, the books generally stick to the known facts and events.

Turning these novels into a movie will be difficult. Doc is a story focused on the main character and his personal relationships and problems, rather than exciting action. The book’s power comes from its thoughtful look at Holliday’s changes, which might not work well in a movie, as films usually emphasize a fast-moving plot.

Epitaph thoroughly explores the social and political environment surrounding the famous gunfight, both before and after it happened. The story has a large cast of characters and a complex political landscape, which is hard to fully develop in a typical movie. Furthermore, the gunfight itself is a relatively small part of the narrative; the book focuses more on what happened afterward and how Wyatt Earp’s reputation was formed.

The detailed and thoughtful nature of Russell’s work – its focus on long-term impacts and the creation of legends – might not be what viewers expect from a typical Western, which usually prioritizes action and heroic stories. While Russell’s novels offer a unique and interesting take on history, adapting them for the screen is challenging. The complex characters and deep themes explored in the books would likely work better in a longer format, like a television series, than in a standard movie.

It’s Time for Hollywood to Leave Doc Holliday Alone

Despite his short life, Doc Holliday has remained a popular figure in Western films. Over the years, many actors have played him, each offering a unique portrayal. Kirk Douglas brought a flair for the dramatic to the role in 1957’s Gunfight at the O.K. Corral, while Stacy Keach depicted him as a thoughtful and introspective man in Doc. More recently, Dennis Quaid focused on Holliday’s failing health in Wyatt Earp, even losing weight to convincingly portray his illness.

Val Kilmer’s portrayal of Doc Holliday in Tombstone is considered definitive, largely setting the standard for how the character is depicted on screen. The film focuses on Doc’s final years, presenting him as both a man facing his mortality and a steadfast friend. Historical records portray Doc Holliday as an intelligent, witty individual with a strong education and fluency in Latin, and Tombstone accurately reflects these traits by showing him as a refined Southern gentleman, a talented gambler, and a deeply loyal companion.

When it comes to movies about Doc Holliday and the Earps, Tombstone and Doc are the most memorable. Tombstone portrays Holliday as a charming but dangerous gunslinger, while Doc offers a more vulnerable and introspective take on the character. Doc focuses on his illness and exhaustion, giving him more emotional depth compared to Val Kilmer’s portrayal. Both films explore different facets of Holliday’s personality, and Doc also delves into his past. Together, these two movies provide a well-rounded understanding of who Doc Holliday truly was.

Two movies offer very different, but complete, portrayals of Doc Holliday: one shows the legendary gunslinger, while the other focuses on the man behind the myth. Because these films already explore him so thoroughly, there’s no need for another biography. Viewers who want to understand Doc Holliday would be better off rewatching these existing films than seeing a new retelling. It’s likely a good thing that Jeremy Renner’s planned adaptation never happened – not because the story isn’t good, but because the role has been portrayed so exceptionally well already that it would be difficult to improve upon.

Viewers generally agree that Tombstone perfectly captured the essence of Doc Holliday, and Doc provided a more thoughtful portrayal. These films have explored the character so thoroughly that any new attempt would likely feel repetitive or inferior. While Mary Doria Russell’s novels about Holliday are excellent, a standard biographical movie doesn’t seem like the right way to adapt them. We don’t need another Western simply for something new, and a new film would probably end up feeling unnecessary, no matter how well-made.

5 Questions
Test Your Doc Holliday Knowledge: Beyond Tombstone’s Shadow
Your Top Score
Attempts
0
0
Report Error

Found an error? Send it so it can be corrected.

Read More

2026-03-05 01:38