Weapons Scores at Box Office After Dumping Pedro Pascal as Fantastic Four Flounders

by

The “exhaustion” of seeing Pedro Pascal too often in films is particularly noticeable in the box office results of the horror movie titled “Weapons“. Originally, Pascal was set to play a role, but later, Josh Brolin took over.

As a devoted cinephile, I’ve noticed a shift in the limelight for an actor once hailed as a Hollywood heartthrob, known for his captivating performances in “The Mandalorian” and “The Last of Us.” However, it appears that his box office appeal has diminished somewhat. This is quite noticeable when comparing the impressive reception of Zach Cregger’s horror thriller “Weapons,” where Pascal found himself back in action amid production challenges, to the less-than-stellar performance of Pascal’s own ventures, such as “Eddington” and Marvel’s “The Fantastic Four: First Steps.

With Weapons projected to rake in over $40 million during its opening weekend, there’s growing speculation that Pascal’s films are either failing miserably or falling short of expectations, leading some to question if his extensive public presence and divisive persona have made him a potential box office risk.

The ‘Weapons’ Recast: A Fortuitous Pivot?

Initially, it was planned that Pedro Pascal would take on the leading role as Archer Graff, a father whose child has gone missing, in this chilling multi-part horror narrative centered around disappearances of high school students in a mystical southwestern town shrouded in fog.

After the Hollywood strikes, Pascal’s busy schedule (which included commitments with Marvel and other prominent roles) left him no choice but to withdraw due to his overloaded schedule.

Director Zach Cregger revealed in interviews that the fallout was chaotic.

Admittedly, a scheduling conflict with Pedro Pascal caused quite a stir, forcing us to re-cast the entire film. The initial cast, comprising Brian Tyree Henry and Renate Reinsve, largely moved on, making room for Josh Brolin to take over from Pascal. Director Cregger described this as starting anew, but the outcome has turned out to be a triumphant success.

Stepping into the limelight of 2025’s cinematic landscape, I find myself compelled to discuss the unexpected triumph that is “Weapons.” Initially projected as a modest contender with a production budget of approximately $38 million, this film has proven its mettle by grossing an impressive $18.2 million on its premiere day, not forgetting the additional $5.7 million earned from Thursday previews.

The current projections are nothing short of astonishing, with analysts predicting a domestic weekend earnings of anywhere between $40 million and $43 million. This places “Weapons” firmly in the winner’s circle for Warner Bros., further bolstering their reputation while adding another feather to the cap of original horror productions.

In essence, this film is not merely defying expectations; it’s redefining them in the realm of horror cinema.

Highly praised and boasting a 96% score on Rotten Tomatoes, the film “Weapons” is not just surpassing Chris Cregger’s previous successful movie “Barbarian” (which earned $40.8 million domestically throughout its run), but it’s also outperforming films like Disney’s “Freakier Friday” on weekend box office charts. The decision to replace Pedro Pascal in the film, contrary to expectations, might have unintentionally increased the appeal of “Weapons” by distancing the project from the actor’s recent string of underperformers.

Pascal’s Summer Slump: From Eddington to Fantastic Four

While Weapons thrives without him, Pascal’s own summer releases paint a starkly different picture.

Initially, the spotlight fell on “Eddington,” a satirical comedy written by Ari Aster. In this film, Colin Farrell and Joaquin Phoenix shared the screen, with Farrell portraying a small-town sheriff who finds himself in the midst of a vampire outbreak, causing him to unravel.

In July 2025, the movie named Eddington was launched, but unfortunately it failed spectacularly. It only managed to earn $625,000 on its opening night previews and a disappointing estimated $5 million during its first weekend. Given that its production budget exceeded $20 million, this marked Phoenix’s fifth consecutive box office failure, underscoring Pascal’s struggle to attract audiences.

It was noted by critics and experts that the main reasons for Pascal’s struggle could be due to ineffective marketing strategies and limited market appeal. However, conversations online suggested an additional factor – a sense of audience fatigue from Pascal’s constant visibility everywhere.

The more significant development occurred with the release of ‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps,’ the much-awaited Marvel reboot, in which Pascal took on the role of Reed Richards/Mr. Fantastic.

On July 25th, 2025, the movie premiered with a powerful start, making $100 million in domestic sales – a notable achievement for Marvel that year. However, it soon experienced a significant decline, earning only $40 million during its second weekend, indicating a potential downfall for the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU). This underperformance could be a warning sign for the MCU’s future.

Current estimates place the film’s worldwide earnings between $520 million and $570 million, with a production budget of $200 million. This falls short of the blockbuster standards necessary to restore Marvel’s financial success following Endgame.

Factors such as the controversial portrayal of Silver Surfer by Julia Garner as Shalla-Bal sparked criticism, but Pascal’s involvement was a key topic in discussions about the film’s poor performance. The significant drop in viewership raises challenging questions about audience exhaustion with superhero movies, and more and more, the potential overexposure of star actors.

A Pattern of Underperformance: Pascal’s Theatrical Track Record Proves He’s No Box Office Draw

Pascal’s flops in 2025 aren’t standalone events; they align with a pattern of theatrical disappointments that question his reliability as a box office attraction. Apart from his achievements on TV, his cinematic career has seen numerous projects that didn’t recover their costs or generate interest, adding credence to the idea of audience fatigue.

In the movie titled “The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent,” released in 2022, Pascal acted alongside Nicolas Cage. The film is a humorous take on a fictional portrayal of Cage himself, blending reality and comedy.

As a cinephile, I was genuinely excited about this highly-anticipated movie with an intriguing plotline and positive reviews (87% on Rotten Tomatoes). However, to my disappointment, the film’s box office performance fell flat, managing only $29 million worldwide against its $30 million production budget. Clearly, it’s safe to say this cinematic endeavor didn’t quite hit the mark with audiences, making it a commercial failure in my book.

In my opinion, playing the villainous Maxwell Lord in “Wonder Woman 1984” (2020) was quite an experience, with the movie being a much-anticipated sequel to the original DC film. With a hefty budget of $200 million, it was set to make waves, but unfortunately, it was released during global lockdowns and simultaneously on HBO Max. Despite this unique distribution strategy, the film only managed to garner $169 million globally – a stark contrast to the original Wonder Woman’s impressive $822 million earnings. Sadly, it received mixed reviews (58% on Rotten Tomatoes) and faced criticism for its narrative choices, leading many to view it as a letdown in comparison to its predecessor.

In 2024, I was part of Ethan Coen’s road-trip comedy, Drive-Away Dolls, where I had a supporting role alongside Pascal. Regrettably, despite an estimated production budget of $5-10 million, it managed to garner only $5.9 million domestically during its theatrical run. Sadly, it seemed to disappear without much of an impact, even though expectations were fairly modest.

Moving back to more recent times, the 2016 action epic film titled “The Great Wall,” which had a budget of $150 million and was intended for global audiences, unfortunately underperformed domestically in the United States, earning only $45.5 million (worldwide: $334 million, still falling short of profitability even after marketing expenses). The film received criticism for its lackluster execution, as indicated by a 35% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

In 2025, closer to our own neighborhoods, a romantic comedy titled “Materialists,” produced by A24 and featuring Pascal as a matchmaker, was released by the studio. Despite debuting as their third-highest opening film, it has since been criticized for being unimpressive, with audiences giving mixed reviews and its total earnings failing to meet expectations for breakout success. This has only served to fuel doubts about Pascal’s ability to draw a large audience.

A pattern emerges across various genres and budgets, indicating that having Pedro Pascal in a film does not automatically ensure box office success. In fact, his involvement often seems to correspond with lower earnings instead. Pedro Pascal’s movies might not always bring in big crowds, and in some cases, they even lose money compared to other films.

The Rise of Pedro Pascal Fatigue: Overexposure and Polarization

In simpler terms, the main point being made isn’t just a fluke; it’s often referred to as “Pedro Pascal overexposure” – a phrase gaining traction on social media and in industry discussions.

As a devoted actor, I’ve noticed that my unwavering workload, spanning from “Gladiator II” to “The Mandalorian & Grogu,” has left some audiences feeling a bit fatigued. Moreover, my public opinions on topics such as immigration and gender rights have stirred controversy among certain segments of the fanbase, potentially distancing them from my work.

The same idea is being reflected widely across various media platforms. Videos on YouTube and discussions on Reddit analyze the potential for Pascal’s disputes, particularly his disagreements with J.K. Rowling regarding gender matters, to transform positive publicity into distractions related to cultural conflicts.

Pedro Pascal’s performance proved crucial. It’s delightful to note that his work surpassed expectations, as it would have been disappointing if a mediocre Marvel film had outperformed Superman at the box office this year.

— Zen Crowski the Villain Emperor (@KiramcoyS) August 3, 2025

A user of X humorously expressed their relief, saying, “Pedro Pascal’s popularity proved to be a game-changer,” as they praised Superman for outperforming Fantastic Four in annual box office earnings.

It’s also widely acknowledged by even those in the defense camp that there is an issue at hand. A Reddit user expressed it as, “For me, it feels more like overuse of popular actors in franchises,” adding, “Pedro Pascal serves as a prime example.

Industry watchers agree, with some predicting Pascal’s omnipresence could harm future projects.

Some critics challenge this perspective, suggesting that declining box office revenues might be due to an oversaturation of superhero movies or script problems, rather than the performances of individual stars. However, the data presents a compelling counterargument: films starring Pascal are struggling at the box office, whereas Weapons, produced without his involvement, is thriving.

I hope Pedro Pascal fatigue ends up harming his box office results.

— WhatsWrong? (@Aww_Whats_Wrong) June 27, 2025

As one X post put it, “I hope Pedro Pascal fatigue ends up harming his box office results.”

Hollywood may need to heed the warning—overexposure can transform a hot commodity into a detriment.

In today’s world where viewer loyalty can be unpredictable, Pascal’s career path serves as a warning story. Removing him from the show “Weapons” wasn’t merely about adjusting schedules; it could have been the decisive move towards unrealized success.

As summer comes to an end, a query persists: Has Pedro Pascal’s career started to falter at the box office? The data and the buzz seem to indicate that this might be the case.

Read More

2025-08-10 15:00