Stephen Colbert’s Late Night Exit: Was Trump Settlement the Final Straw?

by

In a stunning decision that’s causing ripples throughout late-night television, CBS has announced it is cancelling The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, set to conclude in May 2026. This marks the end of an epoch for one of the longest-running TV series on broadcast television.

The network attributed the financial aspects of the situation and the tough conditions in late-night television as the main causes for the show’s cancellation, stressing that this decision has nothing to do with the quality or content of the program itself. This announcement is made during a period when late-night shows are encountering significant challenges, such as reduced viewership and changes in viewing habits due to the rise of streaming services.

Nevertheless, the timing – just a few days following Stephen Colbert’s open criticism of his corporate entity, Paramount Global, for reaching a settlement with President Donald Trump – has sparked curiosity and whispers about potential underlying reasons.

For more than thirty years, The Late Show franchise, starting with David Letterman in 1993 and later taken over by Stephen Colbert in 2015, has been a consistent part of CBS’s programming lineup. In a unified declaration, CBS executives commended Colbert as “unreplaceable,” deciding to discontinue the franchise entirely instead of searching for a new host.

The company expressed pride in Stephen being part of CBS and stated that he and his broadcast will be revered among the legendary figures who shone on late-night TV. This decision regarding finances was made in a difficult economic climate for late-night programming, and it has no connection to the show’s performance, content, or any other Paramount-related matters.

During the recording on Thursday, Colbert personally addressed the latest news, and it’s said that he informed the audience about this development, although specific details regarding his on-screen response are not yet fully disclosed as of now.

The Financial Rationale: A Broader Crisis in Late Night

CBS’s decision highlights the significant financial strains affecting late-night television broadcasting. Previously a profitable segment within network TV, shows such as The Late Show have experienced a decline in profitability due to factors like cord-cutting, the surge of on-demand streaming services, and the fragmentation of audiences attributed, by some, to overly partisan and polarizing political content.

The income generated from advertising, which was historically sustained by a large number of people watching live events, has seen a drop due to more viewers choosing digital platforms such as YouTube and TikTok for their short-form comedy content.

According to experts, the financial landscape is tough, as the expenses for producing an episode, which can reach over $1 million even for well-known personalities such as Colbert, tend to surpass their earnings.

In line with reports suggesting financial austerity at Paramount Global due to their ongoing merger activities and economic fluctuations, I was informed that my continued presence was being reconsidered as a cost-cutting measure – a difficult but understandable decision from CBS’s perspective.

Admirer’s Perspective: I’ve noticed that the challenges Stephen Colbert faces aren’t unique; shows like “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon” and “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” have encountered similar hurdles in their journeys. Yet, fortunately for us viewers, none of these remarkable programs have been terminated thus far.

The Paramount-Trump Settlement: A Flashpoint of Controversy

Mentioning an element of interest, this cancelation is close in time to a significant legal resolution between Paramount Global (the parent company of CBS) and former U.S. President Donald Trump.

On July 2, 2025, Paramount reached an agreement to pay Trump $16 million to settle a lawsuit accusing them of manipulative editing in an interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris during the 2024 election period. However, Trump argues that the settlement could be closer to $35 million.

Based on various reports, Trump has stated that the overall worth of the deal might surpass $32 million to $35 million, taking into account what he refers to as “advertising” agreements or additional arrangements. These could potentially include public service announcements (PSAs) and other promotional aspects.

The lawsuit argued that the broadcast had distorted Harris’s answers, possibly swaying voters’ decisions, and demanded compensation of up to $20 billion. However, the actual settlement figure was much less than this.

Paramount characterized the payment as a sensible compromise to prevent lengthy court battles, with the money designated for Donald Trump’s future presidential library instead of serving his personal interests.

As a discerning movie-goer and critic, I find myself deeply troubled by the recent decision that has been met with disapproval from fellow critics such as Senators Ben Ray Luján and Ed Markey. They have labeled this move as a “frivolous capitulation,” suggesting it’s a thoughtless concession that could potentially erode journalistic integrity and empower political forces to exert undue pressure on media outlets.

As a movie buff, I’ve noticed that this town has been under the microscope within the journalistic community. Some even see it as potentially tarnishing the esteemed reputation of 60 Minutes.

Colbert’s Fiery Critique: “A Big Fat Bribe”

Stephen Colbert did not mince words upon returning from vacation on July 14, 2025.

During my holiday, the parent company of ours, Paramount, settled with Donald Trump for 16 million dollars over his lawsuit concerning 60 Minutes. To express how I feel as an employee who takes pride in this network, I am offended, and it’s uncertain if anything can restore my faith in the company. However, just throwing out a suggestion, that sum could certainly help.

During his speech, he openly criticized Paramount’s choice, referring to the $16 million payment as a “blatant bribe” intended to win Trump’s favor during their negotiations with Skydance Media.

Upon my return from a well-deserved break, I, as a devoted cinephile and lover of truth, couldn’t help but express my disbelief upon learning about the $16 million settlement between my employer and Donald Trump. To me, this doesn’t just smell fishy; it reeks of a “big fat bribe” that no self-respecting individual should ignore.

— Zachary Leeman (@WritingLeeman) July 15, 2025

He stated that such a complex financial arrangement between a government official and themselves has a specific term in legal jargon: It’s often referred to as an undue compensation. Given the context, Paramount’s proprietors are seeking Trump administration approval for the sale of their network to a different owner, Skydance.

Colbert further commented: “Unlike the payoffs from ABC and Twitter, Paramount’s settlement did not involve an apology. That’s a smart move. Instead, the company issued a statement saying, ‘You can have our money, but you will never have our self-respect. You can indeed buy our self-respect for the bargain price of $16 million. We’re in need of funds.’

In my critique, I couldn’t help but resonate with the sentiments shared by fellow Paramount talent, Jon Stewart, during his stint on The Daily Show. His words were a clear call-out, accusing the company of compromising its principles in an attempt to appease President Trump, a stance that felt more like bending the knee than standing tall.

Colbert’s comments pointed out worries that the agreement might lead CBS’s news and entertainment sections to exercise self-restraint in a politically heated atmosphere, due to potential political sensitivity.

Declining Ratings: The Numbers Behind the Narrative

Enhancing the financial storyline is the consistent rise of Colbert’s ratings, although he remains atop the late-night television hierarchy, these numbers have displayed a gradual decline in recent times.

During the April-June period of 2025, the show attracted approximately 2.42 million viewers in total for its initial broadcasts, which represented a modest 1% increase compared to the preceding quarter. However, this rise was a small exception amidst an overall declining trend.

During the period from Q4 of 2023 to Q1 of 2024, there was a total decrease of 9% in viewership, and a more significant drop of 11% in the age group that advertisers are most interested in (18-49 years old).

As a movie enthusiast, by mid-year 2024, I noticed that viewership had dipped even more, reaching approximately 2.35 million viewers. The demo rating dropped to a staggering 0.40, marking a 2% and a significant 9% decrease from the previous figures.

In the early part of 2025, I witnessed a slight rebound, with the first-quarter averages reaching approximately 2.40 million viewers and a 0.38 rating in the key demographic. Remarkably, the second quarter maintained this viewership figure at around 2.42 million, although the demo rating dipped slightly to 0.37.

2025’s May proved challenging, as we experienced a 5% decrease in overall viewership compared to April, coupled with a substantial 20% drop in our demographic audience, leaving us with a demographic share of 3.7.

Across various broadcast industries, late-night viewership has significantly decreased by approximately 32% over the past few years. Shows such as “The Tonight Show” (with an average of 2.2 million viewers) and “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” are also experiencing similar struggles. Some experts suggest that the declines for Colbert’s shows may be due to post-election viewer exhaustion, increased political polarization potentially turning off conservative viewers, and stiff competition from programs like Fox’s “Gutfeld!”.

Analysis and Implications

Although CBS claims that the ending of The Late Show is not connected to its ratings or Colbert’s vocal opinions, the combination of circumstances seems to present a more complex scenario.

The genuine financial pressures affecting the industry have significant consequences, and the aftermath of the settlement along with Colbert’s sharp criticism invite questions regarding corporations’ willingness to accommodate internal disagreements, particularly during times when media conglomerates are dealing with mergers and complex political influence matters.

In its last season, Colbert’s impactful legacy is being tested as the world of late-night television grapples with an unpredictable future amidst the era of digital media.

Read More

2025-07-18 03:59