Movie journalism and film criticism can be likened to an instant account of events, or the early versions of a historical narrative. Unlike historians who have the luxury of hindsight, movie critics write their reviews based on their immediate impressions of newly released films. Often, these opinions are formed without the benefit of time for reflection, as they need to be published promptly following the film’s release. The movie reviews you find on sites like Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic are usually swift assessments, though they are often insightful and well-reasoned in nature. However, it is essential to remember that these are quick evaluations, made without the luxury of a second thought or a full night’s sleep to ponder over the film’s merits.
Today’s ScreenCrush list focuses on 25 classic films that initially received a cool response from critics when they first hit movie theaters. Back then, these movies often faced mixed reviews or outright criticism, but over time their standing has significantly improved. In some instances, these once-maligned films have experienced a complete turnaround in perception.
The term ‘Classic’ can vary, but the majority of these films meet any standard cinematic definition for this label. I restricted my selections to movies that are at least 20 years old to be considered. These types of reevaluation efforts often take a decade or more to transition from being box office disappointments to being widely appreciated, thanks to repeated viewings and television broadcasts.
Classic Movies That Got Bad Reviews From Critics
It’s a Wonderful Life (1946)
The heartwarming film, “It’s a Wonderful Life,” wasn’t initially well-received. It struggled at the box office and received mixed reviews from critics during its initial release. Critic Bosley Crowther of The New York Times even argued that Frank Capra’s portrayal of classic American values felt more like stage performances than real-life experiences. However, over time, it has become beloved as a quintessential Christmas movie.
The Night of the Hunter (1955)
In his acting career, Charles Laughton amassed a notable reputation, performing on stage as well as the silver screen. However, when it came to directing, he only ever made one film – “The Night of the Hunter”, a timeless noir masterpiece that centers around a ruthless serial killer attempting to deceive a woman for her inheritance. Admired by contemporary historians and crime movie enthusiasts, “Night of the Hunter” was initially met with disappointing critical and commercial reception during its release, prompting Laughton to never direct again.
Vertigo (1958)
Any collection of Alfred Hitchcock’s masterpieces is incomplete without “Vertigo”, a work that represents his most unsettling and deeply psychological exploration of desire and sorrow. Today, this film is often considered not just Hitchcock’s magnum opus but one of the best films ever directed; it even surpassed “Citizen Kane” atop the Sight and Sound film poll in 2012 for the first time since 1952. This contrasts starkly with its initial reception in 1958, when audiences found its somber themes and grim conclusion confusing, and many critics shared their sentiments. In fact, The Los Angeles Times’ review was titled “Vertigo Induces Bafflement in Viewer.”
Peeping Tom (1960)
Similar to how the film “Vertigo” was met with criticism due to its unsettling blend of sex and violence, the 1960 British thriller “Peeping Tom,” directed by the acclaimed Michael Powell, received a similar backlash. A critic at the time detested the movie so profoundly that he proposed it should be disposed of by shoveling it into a sewer. The film was so unpopular in the U.K. that it effectively ended Powell’s career as a director. Today, “Peeping Tom” is recognized as part of the Criterion Collection and is generally considered one of the most thought-provoking and influential films ever made on the dark aspect of cinematic spying.
Bonnie and Clyde (1967)
A relatively small number of movies have garnered more infamous negative critiques than “Bonnie and Clyde”. Originally criticized by many mainstream reviewers for its graphic (and, to them, distasteful) violence, the film quickly gained popularity with younger audiences, eventually winning acclaim from new critics such as Pauline Kael and Roger Ebert. They, unlike their peers, praised “Bonnie and Clyde”. The film also inspired one of the most renowned recanted film reviews: Joe Morgenstern from Newsweek initially panned it as a “squalid shoot-’em-up for the moron trade”, only to change his mind upon rewatching, writing a subsequent piece reversing his initial opinion and praising it as a modern classic.
Night of the Living Dead (1968)
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
Stanley Kubrick, a director known for his groundbreaking films, often faced mixed to negative reviews throughout his career. Critics frequently felt that his latest works fell short of his past achievements, only to later acknowledge his genius in retrospective reviews. Many of his films followed this pattern of initial critical dismissal and subsequent appreciation. Two more of Kubrick’s titles will be mentioned later on the list if you’re interested in guessing which they might be.
Among his works is what is now considered his greatest accomplishment: the thought-provoking sci-fi masterpiece, 2001: A Space Odyssey. While some critics, like Roger Ebert, appreciated the film from its inception, others were deeply skeptical of Kubrick’s exploration of the cosmos. Critics such as Andrew Sarris and Pauline Kael expressed their disdain for the film, with Sarris even labeling it a “disaster” and Kael describing it as a “monumentally unimaginative movie.” While opinions about 2001 remain divided to this day, questioning its imagination seems debatable.
The Wild Bunch (1969)
Sam Peckinpah had a knack for exploring mature themes in his Hollywood films, often leading to controversy due to his inclination to test limits. Today, his reinterpretation of the American frontier legend, “The Wild Bunch” from 1969, is highly esteemed as one of the most significant Westerns of the late ’60s. However, its graphic depiction of violence and skepticism towards traditional nationalistic tales sparked a lot of criticism. A notable instance occurred after the film’s debut when a journalist questioned Peckinpah at a press conference, “Why was this movie even produced?”
Sam Peckinpah frequently challenged boundaries with adult content in his films, often inviting controversy due to his desire to test limits. Today, his revisionist portrayal of the American frontier legend, “The Wild Bunch,” made in 1969, is widely recognized as one of the most impressive Westerns of its time. The film’s violent scenes and skepticism towards nationalistic legends led to a significant amount of criticism. A notable example occurred after the movie’s premiere when a journalist asked Peckinpah at a press conference, “Why on earth was this movie made?
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)
Initially met with disdain by critics and audiences alike, the most renowned cult film ever made eventually gained its status following a series of successful midnight showings. After The Rocky Horror Picture Show was initially labeled as a campy disaster by mainstream critics, its distributor successfully persuaded a few theaters to screen it late at night due to the success of similar unconventional films like Pink Flamingos during that period. This strategy proved to be a stroke of genius; the movie soon became a hit at the Waverly Theater in New York’s Greenwich Village, and eventually, midnight screenings began selling out across the country. The film’s legacy was thus established.
The Warriors (1979)
It’s not entirely surprising that some critics struggled to understand “The Warriors”. After all, it presents a unique and dreamlike portrayal of New York City as a city ruled by violent gangs. In fact, this unconventional film seems tailor-made for cult admirers. Despite the initial negative reviews, Walter Hill’s movie has grown in respect and popularity, earning a place among the beloved ’70s genre classics.
The Shining (1980)
When Stanley Kubrick’s interpretation of “The Shining” was initially unveiled on movie screens, it wasn’t just critics who were dismissive; even author Stephen King voiced his disapproval. He found fault with the film’s casting and disliked the alterations made to his original work. What might surprise you is that “The Shining” even garnered Razzie nominations, one of which was for Worst Director. It came as a shock to me that Stephen King participated in the Razzies!
Caddyshack (1981)
In a rather unfair turn of events, comedies seem to receive less critical acclaim than other genres. Many classic comedies that have stood the test of time were initially panned when they first hit theaters. For instance, the iconic 1980s comedy “Caddyshack”, which has garnered immense love over the years, was initially met with criticism and even referred to as a “spinoff” of “Animal House” by some critics. The New York Times itself deemed it as unfunny when compared to “Cheech and Chong’s Next Movie”.
Blade Runner (1982)
It’s surprising that a film like Blade Runner, widely acknowledged as one of the most critically acclaimed and meticulously analyzed science fiction movies ever made, initially received negative reviews. However, it’s important to note that the original version of the film was compromised. This early cut included Harrison Ford’s wooden narration and an ending that was not part of Ridley Scott’s original vision, borrowed from Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining. It wasn’t until fans gained access to Scott’s preferred cuts in the late ’80s and early ’90s that Blade Runner’s reputation truly began to soar.
The Thing
It’s astonishing that the cult classic horror movie “The Thing” received negative reviews in 1982, given its current acclaim as one of the most distinguished horror films of the 20th century. John Carpenter’s gripping tale about an extraterrestrial terrorizing a group at an Antarctic research station has left many modern audiences spellbound. At the time, Vincent Canby from The New York Times harshly criticized it as “a foolish, depressing, overproduced movie.” This peculiar review might suggest that the film critics in 1982 were possibly influenced or even replaced by the very creature they were supposed to be evaluating – a theory that, while not definitive, certainly sparks curiosity!
Top Gun (1987)
In 1986, the movie that catapulted Tom Cruise to superstardom, often recognized as the most thrilling film about a man choosing to teach, was not widely appreciated by critics initially. Despite gaining more favorable reviews in retrospect, Top Gun still receives a poor rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Originally, it was criticized for its emphasis on style over substance. Today, however, it is acknowledged as an iconic ’80s film, a frequently re-watched cable movie, and a reflection of the atmosphere during the Reagan era in America.
This paraphrased version maintains the original meaning while using simpler, more natural language to make it easier for readers to understand.
Predator (1987)
Outside of the “Terminator” series, Arnold Schwarzenegger’s 1980s films did not receive much critical acclaim initially. For instance, “Predator”, which is now often considered one of his most popular ’80s action roles, was panned by Gene Siskel and described as “alternately gruesome and dull, with few unexpected moments” by Janet Maslin in The New York Times. It’s interesting to note that Maslin might have been taken aback when the film turned into a box office success, leading to sequels, spin-offs, and comics, and some of its iconic moments, such as the famous musclebound handshake between Schwarzenegger and Carl Weathers, became enduring images.
Spaceballs (1987)
The character Dark Helmet exclaims, ‘Oh no! Even in the future, things don’t work!’ Meanwhile, President Skroob indulges with several women. Many characters are called A-holes, including when Dark Helmet orders, ‘Keep firing, A-holes!’ Amazingly, this movie titled Spaceballs, filled with swear words and humor, was given a PG rating. This is why my parents, who were cautious, allowed me to watch it at a young age, making it one of my favorite movies as a child. While some 80s film critics didn’t like it, I still believe Spaceballs, despite its A-hole characters and crude humor, is not a bad movie.
Home Alone (1990)
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me (1992)
David Lynch’s prequel to “Twin Peaks,” titled “Fire Walk With Me,” didn’t receive favorable reviews when it was initially released on Rotten Tomatoes. However, this isn’t due to recent negative reviews; instead, most of the site’s recent reviews are positive. When it premiered in 1992, the film was met with criticism and even boos at its Cannes Film Festival debut. It failed at the box office, and many critics believed that Lynch and his team had lost their way after the popular first season of “Twin Peaks.”
Over time, ardent fans of David Lynch have worked to change the film’s perception. They argue that understanding Laura Palmer’s final days as portrayed in “Fire Walk With Me” is crucial for appreciating the rest of the TV series and possibly even Lynch’s entire career. In 1992, many people found the film too strange and odd.
Dumb and Dumber (1994)
If comedies are often overlooked by critics, then the sub-genre of “dumb” comedies might be the most underestimated. A movie like “Dumb and Dumber,” for instance, may have struggled to gain respect from many critics, even if it was a smart comedy with a lack of intelligence. However, over time, the Farrelly brothers’ initial success has become more warmly recalled.
Tommy Boy (1995)
In the ’90s, the skepticism towards “Saturday Night Live” among TV critics was quite noticeable, and film critics seemed even less receptive when its cast members moved to the silver screen. It’s true that some movies starring ’90s “SNL” performers were disappointing, but others were genuinely hilarious – such as “Tommy Boy,” which showcased Chris Farley at his best as an heir to a brake-pad company who embarks on a sales trip to save his family business with the help of a slick co-worker (David Spade). I can’t comprehend why “Tommy want wingy!” was met with poor reviews.
Critics were skeptical about Saturday Night Live in the ’90s, and film critics seemed even less welcoming when its cast members transitioned to movies. While some films featuring ’90s SNL stars were mediocre, others were genuinely funny – like Tommy Boy, a showcase for Chris Farley as an heir to a brake-pad company who goes on a sales trip to save his family’s business with the help of a slick co-worker (David Spade). I still can’t fathom why “Tommy want wingy!” received negative reviews.
The Big Lebowski (1998)
In 1998, some critics found “The Big Lebowski” perplexing as a successor to “Fargo,” the Coen brothers’ most celebrated film up until then. After their highly praised movie and multiple Oscar nominations, the decision to create a comedic mystery about a laid-back detective seemed strange, especially considering the brother’s career trajectory. Initially, many critics didn’t fully grasp its significance in the context of their body of work. However, once the film was evaluated outside of the shadow of that critically acclaimed (and significantly darker) movie, it appeared much more unconventional, to say the least.
Eyes Wide Shut (1999)
A Space Odyssey,” “A Clockwork Orange,” and “Full Metal Jacket.” The film’s notorious orgy scene generated a great deal of controversy, attracting both positive and negative attention. While the film initially faced criticism in 1999, it has since garnered more praise through subsequent critical reappraisals.
Wet Hot American Summer (2001)
The comedy film, “Wet Hot American Summer,” featured thirtysomething actors portraying teenagers, absurd humor that didn’t necessarily follow logic, and even a talking can of mixed vegetables. This movie left many critics puzzled. However, they might not have fully grasped its charm because the rest of us, including the critics, ended up loving “Wet Hot American Summer.” It is undoubtedly one of the funniest and most unusual comedies from the 2000s.
Jackass: The Movie (2002)
The movie “Jackass” isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, particularly not among film critics. The original film’s Rotten Tomatoes score reflects this; with a 49 percent rating, it’s almost evenly divided between positive and negative reviews. Interestingly enough, I found it somewhat surprising that the first “Jackass” – which is arguably the funniest in the series – has the lowest Rotten Tomatoes score of the entire franchise. In contrast, the most recent film, “Jackass Forever,” has a rating of 86, nearly double the original! Perhaps as time passed, film critics (perhaps younger ones who grew up watching the TV series and films) developed an appreciation for crude humor.
Negative Reviews of Classic Films on Letterboxd
Alien
Back to the Future
I didn’t catch the movie today, but during trivia, our team lost by just a single point due to getting the Delorean speed incorrect. As a result, I find myself disliking this film now.
Casablanca
Citizen Kane
I found it incredibly dull. The plot seemed strange, with no clear narrative structure. I didn’t grasp what was going on or who the characters were, and it felt like they changed appearances from scene to scene.
City Lights
I wish I had a curled mustache to twist as I watched it, that’s how much I enjoyed it.
The Empire Strikes Back
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
The Godfather
Goodfellas
Groundhog Day
It’s a Wonderful Life
Jaws
The Lion King
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
The Matrix
Extremely disappointing, I find it nauseating to even think about watching it again. It lacks coherence, is poorly thought out and somewhat geeky; if possible, I’d rate it with negative numbers.
Pulp Fiction
I found the most tedious, overhyped film I’ve ever watched. The dancing sequence was so dull that it required no less than four attempts for me to progress beyond it.
Rio Bravo
Rocky
Clearly, the story unfolds within New York City.
A significant part of the narrative transpires during the final twenty minutes of a lengthy film that lasts for about 20 hours.
However, it seems there’s some frustration towards this development.
Seven Samurai
The Shawshank Redemption
I must admit, I wouldn’t have guessed that any film could be quite so tedious, but this one sets a new standard. It lacks any memorable title moments due to its poor script. Dwayne Johnson would have made the movie more engaging.
This version retains the original sentiment while using more polite and formal language, making it easier for a wider audience to understand and engage with the text.
Singin’ in the Rain
Some Like it Hot
Stop Making Sense
The Thing
Titanic
To Kill a Mockingbird
I must be honest, I haven’t finished reading the entire book, but what I have read so far wasn’t particularly engaging. As a result, I feel compelled to write a less than favorable review.
12 Angry Men
As a cinephile, let me confess that I was forced to catch this flick during one of my law classes. Frankly, I dozed off more times than I can count! By the way, I caught it on Tubi – you know, the streaming service with ads.
2001: A Space Odyssey
Initially, I powered my way through the first three-quarters of it… The third quarter was intense, almost fiery… And then, disappointingly, I found myself back at the beginning in terms of enjoyment when I got to the final quarter. Upon reconsideration, I must confess that I didn’t really care for this film.
Vertigo
I found this movie to be the most disappointing I’ve ever seen. The only thing that saved it was serving as inspiration for season 7 of 9-1-1.
The Wizard of Oz
Read More
- Медведи пируют на VIRTUAL: падение на 12% и отток в 1 миллион долларов – выживет ли надежда?
- Shocking First Look: Nick Frost Transforms into Hagrid in New HBO Series!
- 2025 Emmy Nominations Announced: See the Full List
- Татнефть префы прогноз. Цена префов TATNP
- Евро обгонит вьетнамский донг? Эксперты раскрыли неожиданный сценарий
- Т-Технологии акции прогноз. Цена акций T
- Batman Forever Schumacher Cut Gets Disappointing Update
- Время молота Догекоина: Неужели DOGE наконец готов к взлёту?
- Superman: Kevin Feige ‘Loved’ DCU Movie, Reveals James Gunn’s Response
- How Would Reed Richards And Tony Stark Interact If They Met? Pedro Pascal Has An Idea
2025-08-15 22:41